It is used to evaluate a wide range of personality and psychopathological phenomena, and to plan treatment. The MMPI-2 is one of the most widely used psychological tests in the world, employed in a variety of clinical and occupational settings. Although sampling in this study was limited, implications for the field reliability of MMPI-2 interpretation are sobering. Q-set item analysis was conducted to determine which individual statements had the most impact on interpretive reliability. There was also not a significant difference between within-profile and cross-profile correlations. 39, lower than expected, and there was no significant difference in reliability between profiles. Mean pairwise interpretive reliability was. To measure the “interpretive reliability” of the MMPI-2 profile interpretations, q-sort descriptions were intercorrelated. Each participant interpreted one of two common MMPI-2 profiles using a q-set of 100 statements designed for MMPI-2 interpretation.
![mmpi 2 scoring interpretation mmpi 2 scoring interpretation](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/catatonia-130407013947-phpapp01/95/catatonia-28-638.jpg)
Mmpi 2 scoring interpretation professional#
Participants were 20 MMPI-2 users who responded to E-mail solicitations on professional listservs and in personal emails. This study was an attempt to measure the reliability of such integrated interpretations using a q-sort research methodology. Instead, clinicians integrate inferences from a multitude of scales simultaneously, producing a descriptive narrative that is thought to characterize the examinee. Users of multi-scale tests like the MMPI-2 tend not to interpret scales one at a time in a way that would correspond to standard scale-level reliability information.